Narrowcasting the Gospel

By nickpark

Narrowcasting is, as the name suggests, the opposite of Broadcasting.  In Broadcasting we scatter a message far and wide and hit as broad a selection of targets as possible.  In Narrowcasting we aim at a clearly defined target.

My thinking about this was sparked by a meeting I attended while in the US recently.  The preacher was a fairly young guy (younger then me anyway!) but his preaching was of a style that seemed to belong to an older generation.  It was very stylized – with lots of shouting, sweating and ‘huh’s.  I have to admit that it was so alien to my culture that I sat transfixed by the spectacle.  I felt like an anthropologist observing some kind of fertility rite in a newly discovered tribe in the jungle.

Some ministers that I respect enormously were sitting near me – and they were loving it!  They were shouting encouragement, waving their hands, standing to their feet on occasion – and I’m asking myself if I am just plain unspiritual or a ungodly heathen because it was all leaving me cold.  At the end of the meeting another friend whom I really respect said, “Well, we really had some preaching tonight, didn’t we?”

I didn’t know how to answer so I just kept my mouth shut.  Evidently my friend had experienced what to him was ‘real preaching’ – but I just felt like I had experienced a cultural performance – interesting, but not something that helped me sense the presence of the Holy Spirit.

Thinking on this some more, I realised how our styles of ministry, including preaching, are becoming more and more examples of narrowcasting as society continues to diversify into a multitude of subcultures.  I guess my normal preaching style (conversational, storytelling interspersed with jokes, strolling about the platform) would hardly seem like ‘real preaching’ to someone raised on a diet of shouting, sweating and ‘huh’s.  To our people in Ireland it can mediate the presence of the Holy Spirit, but to those raised on grits it might just manifest itself as an intriguing cultural performance.

Our style of ministry will speak volumes about which segments of the population we are trying to reach.  If we are narrowcasting to a receptive and growing demographic then Church Growth should, all other things being equal, result.  If we are narrowcasting to a resistant or shrinking demographic then tough times are coming.  As Frank Sinatra sang, “There may be trouble ahead …”

One of the joys about multicultural ministry is that you learn to be adaptable.  You can present your message in different ways.  I’ve learned to preach like an Irishman, a Romanian and an African when the occasion demands.  I guess the sweating, shouting, ‘huh’ing preacher I heard recently, judging by the reactions of those sitting round me,  was spot on as far as most of his audience were concerned.  I found myself wondering what kind of people populate his church.  Are they all raised on that kind of preaching?  Or maybe he’s as adaptable as they come and wows an unchurched crowd with a superb Bill Hybels impression.

What is scary is when you get people who can’t adapt their style of ministry to fit the congregation.  We’ve had a few guest speakers come to Ireland and get quite upset with our congregation.  “Why are y’all so quiet?”  they demand, “I thought this was supposed to be a Pentecostal Church!”  What they don’t realise is that our people will shout the house down if they are getting a bit of revelational truth that meshes with their spirits – but they aren’t about to mistake the shouting of cliches with increased volume for the anointing of God.  In some cases our congregation was genuinely quite concerned that the screaming sweating visiting preacher was about to have a heart attack (we have a number of medical doctors in the Church).

So, what is the conclusion to be drawn from these cultural musings of mine?  Quite simply we need to be aware of the power of narrowcasting.  If we’re happy with the results that our ministry is producing and the demographic that we’re touching then great!  If not, then it’s time to adapt our changing presentation of the unchanging message to narrowcast to our intended target group.  Just thinking we can broadcast the message indiscriminately will leave a whole swathe of unreached people groups in our immediate vicinity.

10 Responses to “Narrowcasting the Gospel”

  1. Nick Park on Contextualized Preaching « Missional Church of God Says:

    [...] Park on Contextualized Preaching Posted on August 23, 2008 by travjohnson Check out this really great piece on Nick Park’s blog about contextualized preaching.  It really is a great piece, worthy of [...]

  2. Bobby Scott Says:

    Nick,

    I honestly believe I know which meeting you are referring to, and I believe that I was probably thinking the same thing while it was all going on.

    I pastor a rebirth of a church (of sorts) in Middle Tennessee, USA. My conflicted interests with “preaching” has been that I do not fit the mold of our organizational style in general; and struggle with those who do. It seems all too often that the “huh’s” are not natural and stylistic for those who are preaching; but they are learned behaviors that allow the speaker to flow within our denomination. This bugs me, and I’m not really sure why.

    Bottom line, in the midst of my struggles with those who “huh”, I really believe the Spirit of God spoke to me and said simply this: “Don’t preach to please preachers. Communicate.”

    Don’t know if that makes sense. Just wanted to let you know that I feel ya. By the way, I meant to introduce myself to you in TX, but I didn’t. Sorry about that.

  3. mike mcmullin Says:

    I made a similar observation about this cultural style of preaching. It was met with less than favorable reviews.

    Sometimes we confuse a style of preaching or worship with the anointing of God. Perhaps past experiences or what we have grown up with impacts how we interpret the Spririt.

    I think there are less and less people who respond to the style you witnessed.

  4. Positive Infinity » Blog Archive » From Whence Come the Difficulty, Also Comes the Solution Says:

    [...] From Whence Come the Difficulty, Also Comes the Solution23 August 2008, me @ 22:24I found this entry in Nick Park’s blog (also here) very [...]

  5. Contextualized Communion « Missional Church of God Says:

    [...] Top Clicks actscelerate.comnickpark.wordpress.com/20…chrisgoins.blogspot.combillisaacs.orgtravjohnson.wordpress.com…cogworshipcenter.com/inde…bobscott.wordpress.comgodtube.com/view_video.ph…vulcanhammer.org/?p=945forhopeandhealing.com/For… [...]

  6. Nathan Says:

    Nick,
    Great post… For many years I thought if you didn’t spit over the first three rows you couldn’t be COG. I grew up as a PK with a Dad who wasn’t shy about yelling. Thankfully he didn’t use the “huh” though.

    I started down that road as an Associate Pastor and a couple of things between then and becoming a church planter in an unchurched area helped me. God knew that yelling wasn’t going to work for me. Plus I really don’t have the voice to pull it off. There is nothing worse than a bad yeller.

    One of the things that helped me was going to speak at Travis Johnson’s church in Homestead. Travis was in his stool phase and so I actually used it while I was there and it was really the first time I felt comfortable. I have “ants in my pants” and can’t stand still so sitting stopped the urge to “go”. Now I can utilize standing to emphasize a point instead of just taking the yelling up a decibel.

    I also heard the audible voice of the Lord and it sounded a lot like my wife. She said that even though she knew that God wanted to tell her something through the message she couldn’t get it because I was yelling. She also said that if I didn’t stop moving she would have to start taking Dramamine before service. It hurt a little but better to hear from her than a failing church plant because I am fairly confident our community would not respond to the “huh”.

    Being that my wife represents a large portion of the demographic of our community I now understand that God was contextualizing my style to the people He intended for me to reach.

  7. Chad Fickett Says:

    Hi Pastor Nick,
    I enjoyed your blog. I will point out something that bothers me. I have ment the young man and he is a very genuine and sincere minister. His congregation definately fits the mold culturally for that style of preaching. I have heard him on several occassions and I assure you he preaches the same way each time. I like that there are different molds that we have to fit to communicate the Gospel. I have always seen it as a challenge. What bothers me is like Brother Scott commented that just because it wasnt his cup of tea this must mean the preacher was just trying to please the listeners. I have trouble with that statement. Maybe Im reading way to much into it.
    Be Blessed

  8. nickpark Says:

    Chad, I don’t think there’s anything wrong in trying to please the listeners. We want to communicate a message to people, and we can do that most effectively when the packaging around the message is attractive to the hearers. That is a fundamental axiom of communication theory – good communication must be oriented towards the culture and needs of the respondent.

    I unashamedly adapt my preaching style to suit my audience. Heck, if I preach in the Southern US I can shout and sweat like any good old boy – but I draw the line at the ‘huh’s. Of course we need to remember that the packaging is just that – packaging. If that is all we do then the packaging is empty and we might as well all go home and watch TV instead.

    I think the apostle Paul is one of the best examples of contextualising preaching. Just read the Book of Acts and compare the sermons Paul preaches to a Jewish audience to those he preaches to Gentiles. His Jewish messages are full of Scripture quotes – yet in one sermon to the Gentiles he doesn’t even quote Scripture once (I think even my Church would fire me if I did that).

    Now, I don’t think the preacher in my original post was ‘just’ pleasing the hearers. I think he had something worth saying and he communicated that in a way that pleased a lot of his hearers – certainly those who were sitting near me. I’m not criticizing him at all – in fact I think he did a better than I would have in that particular setting.

  9. Micah Andrews Says:

    Nick,
    Great to see you are still kickin’. Email me so we can catch up… lots of changes here in my little world. In response to your post… after 12 years in ministry I had pretty much settled in to my own style and methodology. My style would be at best teaching and at worst preaching. I too have on many occassions felt “unspiritual” because I was not moved by the verbal beating of certain preachers. Call it a difference in taste, call it a difference in style, call it brow beating or whatever… I just did not connect. The biggest lesson I have recently learned about public communication has come from my recent change of venue. I now serve at a recovery center that plays home, work, and church to more than 225 recovering addicts. What I have learned is that they do not need my antics, my performance or anything else from me. They need to hear from Him. I am forced to be the agent of communication in a very diverse group. I am in a sense required to be (in communication style) simple. I often think about the approach of one of the best… Brother Graham. Billy G. is so simplistic and yet look at his fruit. With the exception of him being Baptist… maybe we could all learn a little (totally just kidding). I’d love to hear from you old friend.

  10. Chad Fickett Says:

    Nick I agree with you. By the way you looked fine back stage I thought you fit right in.
    Be Blessed

Leave a Reply